Home Cardiac arrest Good-quality bystander CPR triples OHCA survival
Cardiac arrest
Good-quality bystander CPR triples OHCA survival
Paramedic-assessed quality of bystander CPR is associated with survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation · Added 23 August 2026
NSW registry study (n=17,715) found any bystander CPR increased 30-day survival odds by 70%, but good-quality bystander CPR more than tripled odds (aOR 2.62) while poor-quality CPR showed no benefit.
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Population-based registry cohort study
- Participants
- 17,715 patients with OHCA
- Main finding
- Bystander CPR increased 30-day survival odds (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.24-2.34); good-quality CPR aOR 2.62 (95% CI 1.86-3.68); poor-quality CPR no benefit (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.45).
- Caveat
- Bystander CPR quality recorded in only 62.1% of cases and paramedic-assessed, so misclassification likely
- Bottom line
- Supports current practice
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Large Australian registry with direct relevance to dispatch-assisted CPR quality measurement and dispatcher coaching.
Learning goal
Strengthen my ability to assess bystander CPR quality and use it to guide resuscitation decisions.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 23 August 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Kidney biomarkers predict outcomes after OHCA
Prospective study of 82 comatose OHCA patients found kidney-specific biomarkers (plasma and urinary NGAL and KIM-1, cystatin C) were superior to serum creatinine for early AKI detection and prediction of poor neurological outcomes at discharge.
-
MRI profiles of postanoxic status epilepticus
Two-center study of 192 postanoxic patients using quantitative MRI found postanoxic status epilepticus exhibited more favorable hypoxic-ischemic brain injury profiles (higher whole-brain ADC values) compared with generalized periodic discharges or malignant EEG patterns.
-
Wearables could double unwitnessed OHCA survival
WA simulation modelling across 11,450 OHCA cases estimated wearable pulselessness-detection could double 30-day survival among unwitnessed arrests (0.5% to 1.1%) with 10% device uptake and 80% sensitivity.
-
Double sequential defibrillation shows no benefit
NZ EMS observational study (n=1,401) found no survival benefit after DSD implementation for refractory VF/VT, with lower ROSC odds in DSD patients likely reflecting confounding by indication.