Paramedic Papers

Home Operations & systems Predicting ground vs helicopter EMS travel times

Operations & systems

Predicting ground vs helicopter EMS travel times

Development and validation of methods to predict ground- and helicopter-based emergency medical service travel times
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2026-11-02 · Added 3 November 2026

A modelling study validated open-source routing and historical-data methods for predicting ground and helicopter EMS travel times, achieving R² of 0.79 for ground drive time to scene but only 0.38 for helicopter time to hospital.

Study type
Modelling
Design
Model development and validation using open-source routing and historical travel times
Participants
Not reported
Main finding
Best ground EMS models explained R² 0.79 (drive time to location) and 0.70 (to hospital) versus R² 0.46 and 0.38 for helicopter flight times; mean absolute percentage error 18–20% across all methods
Caveat
Helicopter times were much harder to predict, and accuracy varies with local geography and data quality
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). HEMS dispatch decisions are made by every Australian service and time-benefit estimation is the crux of helicopter versus ground selection; the open-source tools are there for any service to adapt.

Learning goal

Understand how travel time prediction accuracy shapes my decisions when requesting helicopter transport over ground crews.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI)

More

Related papers on Operations & systems