Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest ITDs in OHCA: early wins, late losses

Cardiac arrest

ITDs in OHCA: early wins, late losses

Outcomes Following Impedance Threshold Device Use During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Resuscitation · 2026-10 · Added 10 October 2026

A 97,439-patient US national EMS sample found impedance threshold device use was associated with better prehospital ROSC (aOR 1.09) but lower survival to discharge (23.9% vs 32.0%, aOR 0.68), with even more extreme trends when combined with active compression-decompression.

Study type
Registry
Design
Retrospective national EMS registry analysis
Participants
97,439 adults with non-traumatic OHCA
Main finding
ITD-only: ROSC 26.7% vs 23.8% (aOR 1.09) but survival to discharge 23.9% vs 32.0% (aOR 0.68), with worse neurological outcomes; ITD+ACD showed more extreme versions of both trends
Caveat
Only 23.3% of patients had disposition outcomes available, and device use was not randomised
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). Impedance threshold devices aren't carried by every Australian service, so this informs the device debate more than day-to-day practice — but the questions apply wherever they are used.

Learning goal

Weigh the risks and benefits of impedance threshold devices during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest