Home Cardiac arrest Community CPR training only helps public arrests
Cardiac arrest
Community CPR training only helps public arrests
Evaluating the effect of a regional training initiative on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation · Added 3 September 2026
Difference-in-differences evaluation of a year-long community hands-only CPR training initiative across 20,414 OHCAs — overall bystander CPR rates rose from 37.4% to 42.5% but the adjusted intervention effect wasn't significant (+2.94 pp, 95% CI −0.95 to 6.83); only public-location arrests showed a significant increase (+8.59 pp), with no effect at home and no detectable survival or neurological benefit.
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Difference-in-differences registry evaluation (CARES, 2022–2024)
- Participants
- 20,414 OHCA patients (15,417 intervention region)
- Main finding
- Overall bystander CPR rose 37.4% to 42.5% but adjusted intervention effect not significant (+2.94 pp, 95% CI −0.95 to 6.83); public-location arrests +8.59 pp (95% CI 0.22–16.96); no significant effect at home or on survival or neurologically intact survival
- Caveat
- Non-randomised county comparison; possible secular trends and contamination
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Bystander CPR education underpins Australian community resuscitation strategy and ambulance-led CPR awareness campaigns — the public-but-not-home signal is directly relevant to how we target training effort.
Learning goal
Understand how community CPR training influences bystander CPR rates across arrest locations and why gains favour public arrests.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 3 September 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Intra-arrest TOE feasible but no survival gain
Scoping review of 22 studies (1,254 patients, 84% OHCA) mapping intra-arrest transoesophageal echocardiography — insertion succeeded in 80–100% of cases and TEE changed management in 31–48% of patients, but the two randomised trials found no difference in ROSC, survival, or favourable neurological outcome versus conventional CPR.
-
Racial gaps in bystander CPR for opioid OHCA
Retrospective cohort study using NEMSIS data (n=19,612) found Black patients with opioid-associated OHCA had significantly lower odds of receiving bystander CPR than White patients (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63-0.77), with Hispanic patients also less likely (AOR 0.82).
-
Paramedic elevation doesn't help CPR in obesity simulation
Randomised crossover simulation trial testing whether 10cm elevation of paramedics improves chest compression quality in obese manikins — it didn't, obesity still impaired compression depth by ~18mm despite increased rescuer effort
-
First responders don't shift OHCA survival
Retrospective cohort testing whether community first responder attendance improves OHCA survival in North East England — it didn't, with survival to discharge essentially unchanged (9.6% vs 10.2%, p=0.797) after Utstein adjustment.