Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest Community CPR training only helps public arrests

Cardiac arrest

Community CPR training only helps public arrests

Evaluating the effect of a regional training initiative on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation · Added 3 September 2026

Difference-in-differences evaluation of a year-long community hands-only CPR training initiative across 20,414 OHCAs — overall bystander CPR rates rose from 37.4% to 42.5% but the adjusted intervention effect wasn't significant (+2.94 pp, 95% CI −0.95 to 6.83); only public-location arrests showed a significant increase (+8.59 pp), with no effect at home and no detectable survival or neurological benefit.

Study type
Registry
Design
Difference-in-differences registry evaluation (CARES, 2022–2024)
Participants
20,414 OHCA patients (15,417 intervention region)
Main finding
Overall bystander CPR rose 37.4% to 42.5% but adjusted intervention effect not significant (+2.94 pp, 95% CI −0.95 to 6.83); public-location arrests +8.59 pp (95% CI 0.22–16.96); no significant effect at home or on survival or neurologically intact survival
Caveat
Non-randomised county comparison; possible secular trends and contamination
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Bystander CPR education underpins Australian community resuscitation strategy and ambulance-led CPR awareness campaigns — the public-but-not-home signal is directly relevant to how we target training effort.

Learning goal

Understand how community CPR training influences bystander CPR rates across arrest locations and why gains favour public arrests.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest