Home Cardiac arrest Paramedic elevation doesn't help CPR in obesity simulation
Cardiac arrest
Paramedic elevation doesn't help CPR in obesity simulation
Effect of Body Position on Chest Compression Quality During CPR in an Obesity Simulation Model: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Prehospital Emergency Care · Added 1 September 2026
Randomised crossover simulation trial testing whether 10cm elevation of paramedics improves chest compression quality in obese manikins — it didn't, obesity still impaired compression depth by ~18mm despite increased rescuer effort
- Study type
- Simulation
- Design
- Randomised crossover simulation trial
- Participants
- 60 paramedics
- Main finding
- Compression depth reduced ~18 mm with simulated obesity (adjusted mean differences 17.83 mm and 18.44 mm vs standard, both p<0.001); 10 cm paramedic elevation made no difference (p=0.523)
- Caveat
- Simulation with manikins, not real patients
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). transferability — Directly relevant to cardiac arrest care (CMG 4), practical ergonomic finding that doesn't require equipment change
Learning goal
Understand how patient obesity affects my ability to achieve effective compression depth during resuscitation.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 1 September 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Community CPR training only helps public arrests
Difference-in-differences evaluation of a year-long community hands-only CPR training initiative across 20,414 OHCAs — overall bystander CPR rates rose from 37.4% to 42.5% but the adjusted intervention effect wasn't significant (+2.94 pp, 95% CI −0.95 to 6.83); only public-location arrests showed a significant increase (+8.59 pp), with no effect at home and no detectable survival or neurological benefit.
-
Intra-arrest TOE feasible but no survival gain
Scoping review of 22 studies (1,254 patients, 84% OHCA) mapping intra-arrest transoesophageal echocardiography — insertion succeeded in 80–100% of cases and TEE changed management in 31–48% of patients, but the two randomised trials found no difference in ROSC, survival, or favourable neurological outcome versus conventional CPR.
-
Racial gaps in bystander CPR for opioid OHCA
Retrospective cohort study using NEMSIS data (n=19,612) found Black patients with opioid-associated OHCA had significantly lower odds of receiving bystander CPR than White patients (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63-0.77), with Hispanic patients also less likely (AOR 0.82).
-
First responders don't shift OHCA survival
Retrospective cohort testing whether community first responder attendance improves OHCA survival in North East England — it didn't, with survival to discharge essentially unchanged (9.6% vs 10.2%, p=0.797) after Utstein adjustment.