Paramedic Papers

Home Sepsis & infection Eight sepsis subgroups found, SENECA not replicated

Sepsis & infection

Eight sepsis subgroups found, SENECA not replicated

Discovery of eight stable subgroups of sepsis in the emergency department with consensus clustering
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · Added 5 September 2026

Retrospective consensus clustering of 953 ED sepsis admissions at Oslo University Hospital could not replicate the four SENECA phenotypes, instead finding eight stable subgroups with more granular characteristics — and only 49% of patients meeting SENECA inclusion criteria fulfilled Sepsis-3, underlining sepsis heterogeneity and cohort-definition problems.

Study type
Cohort
Design
Retrospective consensus clustering cohort
Participants
953 adults with sepsis admitted to a single Oslo ED, 2019–2023
Main finding
The four SENECA phenotypes could not be replicated; eight stable subgroups with more granular characteristics were identified. Only 49% of patients meeting SENECA inclusion criteria fulfilled Sepsis-3 criteria.
Caveat
Retrospective, single-centre data
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (Low relevance). Retrospective ED phenotyping with no immediate prehospital application, though it reinforces why ACTAS sepsis recognition (CMG 38) leans on simple bedside criteria like qSOFA

Learning goal

Understand how sepsis phenotype heterogeneity and differing case definitions affect recognition and risk stratification in my prehospital practice.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI)

More

Related papers on Sepsis & infection