Home Cardiac arrest Defibrillation strategy RCT gets underway
Cardiac arrest
Defibrillation strategy RCT gets underway
Strategies for Defibrillation during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest – Protocol for a Randomised Clinical Trial
Resuscitation Plus · 2026-10 · Added 8 October 2026
Protocol for a multinational 3-arm RCT testing whether anterior-posterior pad placement or double sequential defibrillation beats standard anterior-lateral defibrillation for 30-day survival in shockable OHCA — no results yet, with 320 of a planned 909 patients enrolled.
- Study type
- RCT
- Design
- Multinational 3-group randomised clinical trial (protocol)
- Participants
- Planned 909; 320 enrolled by September 2026 (Denmark, Finland, Belgium, Ireland)
- Main finding
- Protocol only — adults with shockable OHCA and two manual defibrillators available are randomised 1:1:1 to anterior-lateral, anterior-posterior, or double sequential defibrillation, with 30-day survival as the primary outcome; no efficacy results reported
- Caveat
- A trial protocol with no outcome data — nothing here changes practice until results land, likely several years away
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Pad placement and double sequential shock are live debates wherever crews carry manual defibrillators, and this trial is the first properly powered head-to-head on 30-day survival.
Learning goal
Update my understanding of defibrillation pad placement strategies for shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 8 October 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Amiodarone after non-shockable-to-shockable conversion
German Resuscitation Registry propensity-matched cohort testing whether amiodarone helps OHCA patients whose initial non-shockable rhythm converts to shockable — it was associated with better 24-hour and survival-to-discharge, though not clearly better neurological outcome.
-
Long resuscitations don't rule out good recovery
Danish national registry study of bystander-witnessed OHCA survivors asking whether longer time-to-ROSC means worse long-term outcomes — anoxic brain damage rose with time, but long-term survival, return to work and nursing-home admission did not, showing prolonged resuscitation doesn't preclude good recovery.
-
TANGO2: compression-only vs standard bystander CPR
Protocol for TANGO2, a Swedish-Italian dispatcher-randomised non-inferiority trial testing whether bystander compression-only CPR is non-inferior to standard CPR for 30-day survival in ~3,260 dispatch-assisted OHCA patients.
-
Bystander AEDs work — when someone actually grabs one
Korean multicentre OHCA registry analysis estimating bystander AED effectiveness against a no-defibrillation reference — AED application was associated with outcomes comparable to or better than EMS shocks, but was applied in only a fraction of eligible cases, especially at home.