Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest Big community arrest programme didn't change survival

Cardiac arrest

Big community arrest programme didn't change survival

Community and EMS Interventions to Improve Survival in Cardiac Arrest
The New England Journal of Medicine · 2026-11-08 · Added 10 November 2026

A cluster-randomised trial across 55 North Carolina county clusters (22,459 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest) found a multifaceted community and EMS programme did not improve survival with good neurological outcome (9.0% vs 9.4%).

Study type
RCT
Design
Registry-based cluster-randomised trial (CARES registry, North Carolina)
Participants
22,459 adults with OHCA across 55 county clusters
Main finding
Survival to discharge with good neurological outcome 9.0% (intervention) vs 9.4% (usual care), adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.75–1.26, P = 0.80
Caveat
The intervention bundled four components, so it can't show whether one element — such as telecommunicator CPR instructions — underperformed
Bottom line
Supports current practice

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Dispatch recognition, telephone CPR instructions, community CPR training and first-responder AED use are core parts of Australian systems, and this is a large cluster-randomised trial with a clear null result.

Learning goal

Weigh how bundled community and EMS resuscitation interventions influence survival outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest