Home Cardiac arrest Cold-water immersion in heatstroke cardiac arrest
Cardiac arrest
Cold-water immersion in heatstroke cardiac arrest
Cold-water immersion during out-of-hospital heatstroke cardiac arrest resuscitation: feasible but futile?
Resuscitation Plus · Added 4 August 2026
Examines feasibility and outcomes of cold-water immersion during prehospital heatstroke cardiac arrest resuscitation
- Study type
- Other
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (Low relevance). No abstract available — cannot assess findings or applicability to Australian practice
Learning goal
Weigh the benefits and limitations of cold-water immersion during resuscitation of heat-related cardiac arrest.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 4 August 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Swedish public CPR willingness and AED awareness
Population-based survey found 80% of Swedish adults willing to perform CPR on a stranger, with recent training increasing confidence and awareness, but only 20% know where their nearest AED is located at home.
-
Individualised MAP targets after OHCA (protocol)
Phase II protocol testing whether individualised MAP targets derived from real-time cerebral autoregulation monitoring reduce secondary brain injury after cardiac arrest — this proof-of-concept trial uses near-infrared spectroscopy and transcranial Doppler to identify each patient's optimal MAP rather than applying uniform targets.
-
Bystander rescue breathing no benefit in suffocation OHCA
This retrospective cohort of 76,774 Japanese patients with witnessed suffocation-related OHCA found no bystander CPR was associated with higher favourable neurological outcomes compared with compression-only CPR (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04-1.38), while CCV-CPR showed no significant difference versus compression-only.
-
Refractory VF rare with worse outcomes
This registry study of 436 OHCA patients compared refractory VF (all three shocks failed to terminate, 5% of cases) versus recurrent VF, finding refractory VF patients had lower ROSC (41% vs 59%) and 30-day survival (23% vs 46%) with predictors including no CPR/AED before EMS, longer delay to first shock, and lower amplitude spectral area.