Home Cardiac arrest Refractory VF rare with worse outcomes
Cardiac arrest
Refractory VF rare with worse outcomes
Refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: shock characteristics, predictors and clinical outcomes
Resuscitation · Added 3 August 2026
This registry study of 436 OHCA patients compared refractory VF (all three shocks failed to terminate, 5% of cases) versus recurrent VF, finding refractory VF patients had lower ROSC (41% vs 59%) and 30-day survival (23% vs 46%) with predictors including no CPR/AED before EMS, longer delay to first shock, and lower amplitude spectral area.
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Registry cohort with ECG waveform analysis (ARREST registry)
- Participants
- 436 patients with VF at first three rhythm checks; 22 with refractory VF
- Main finding
- Refractory VF in 5% of cases; ROSC 41% vs 59% (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41-1.15) and 30-day survival 23% vs 46% (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-1.08) versus recurrent VF; predictors included no bystander CPR/AED, longer delay to first shock, lower amplitude spectral area
- Caveat
- Only 22 refractory VF patients, so outcomes were underpowered and remain uncertain
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Directly relevant to OHCA VF management and defibrillation decision-making, though low event numbers limit certainty
Learning goal
Recognise the patient and rhythm factors that predict refractory ventricular fibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 3 August 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Individualised MAP targets after OHCA (protocol)
Phase II protocol testing whether individualised MAP targets derived from real-time cerebral autoregulation monitoring reduce secondary brain injury after cardiac arrest — this proof-of-concept trial uses near-infrared spectroscopy and transcranial Doppler to identify each patient's optimal MAP rather than applying uniform targets.
-
Cold-water immersion in heatstroke cardiac arrest
Examines feasibility and outcomes of cold-water immersion during prehospital heatstroke cardiac arrest resuscitation
-
Bystander rescue breathing no benefit in suffocation OHCA
This retrospective cohort of 76,774 Japanese patients with witnessed suffocation-related OHCA found no bystander CPR was associated with higher favourable neurological outcomes compared with compression-only CPR (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04-1.38), while CCV-CPR showed no significant difference versus compression-only.
-
Physician-led prehospital ECPR: small eligible subset
Observational cohort testing an EMS physician-led prehospital ECPR activation protocol for refractory VT/VF cardiac arrest — only 4.3% of 347 OHCA patients were eligible, ECPR was activated in 66.7% of eligible patients, and 40% of the activation group survived to discharge with good neurological outcome.