Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest Refractory VF rare with worse outcomes

Cardiac arrest

Refractory VF rare with worse outcomes

Refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: shock characteristics, predictors and clinical outcomes
Resuscitation · Added 3 August 2026

This registry study of 436 OHCA patients compared refractory VF (all three shocks failed to terminate, 5% of cases) versus recurrent VF, finding refractory VF patients had lower ROSC (41% vs 59%) and 30-day survival (23% vs 46%) with predictors including no CPR/AED before EMS, longer delay to first shock, and lower amplitude spectral area.

Study type
Registry
Design
Registry cohort with ECG waveform analysis (ARREST registry)
Participants
436 patients with VF at first three rhythm checks; 22 with refractory VF
Main finding
Refractory VF in 5% of cases; ROSC 41% vs 59% (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41-1.15) and 30-day survival 23% vs 46% (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-1.08) versus recurrent VF; predictors included no bystander CPR/AED, longer delay to first shock, lower amplitude spectral area
Caveat
Only 22 refractory VF patients, so outcomes were underpowered and remain uncertain
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Directly relevant to OHCA VF management and defibrillation decision-making, though low event numbers limit certainty

Learning goal

Recognise the patient and rhythm factors that predict refractory ventricular fibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest