Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest Video dispatcher CPR no better than phone

Cardiac arrest

Video dispatcher CPR no better than phone

Telemedicine-assisted vs conventional telephone instruction in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the TACTIC cluster randomized trial
Resuscitation · Added 29 July 2026

Cluster-randomized trial of 108 OHCA patients compared video-assisted dispatcher CPR instruction with conventional telephone instruction, finding no difference in bystander CPR rates (87.3% vs 92.5%, p=0.53) or ongoing CPR at EMS arrival, but significantly lower protocol compliance in the telemedicine group.

Study type
RCT
Design
Pragmatic pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial
Participants
108 adults with non-traumatic OHCA (55 TA-CPR, 53 DA-CPR)
Main finding
Bystander CPR rate 87.3% (TA-CPR) vs 92.5% (DA-CPR), p=0.53; ongoing CPR at EMS arrival 76.4% vs 84.9%, p=0.33. Protocol compliance significantly lower in TA-CPR (69.1% vs 92.5%).
Caveat
Small pilot with imbalanced baseline characteristics (younger patients, more shockable rhythms in TA-CPR) and limited power.
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Learning goal

Weigh the value of video-assisted dispatcher CPR against conventional telephone instruction when supporting bystanders during cardiac arrest.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest