Paramedic PapersHome Cardiac arrest Sex-specific defibrillation findings defended
Cardiac arrest
Sex-specific defibrillation findings defended
Reply to: Sex-specific effects of manual pressure augmentation during defibrillation: a mechanistic hypothesis
Resuscitation · Added 29 July 2026
Author response to criticism of sex-specific findings in the DOSE VF trial, defending the methodology and arguing biological plausibility for differential effects of manual pressure augmentation.
- Study type
- Other
- Bottom line
- Context only
Learning goal
Weigh whether sex-specific physiological differences should change my use of manual pressure augmentation during defibrillation.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 29 July 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Physician-led prehospital ECPR: small eligible subset
Observational cohort testing an EMS physician-led prehospital ECPR activation protocol for refractory VT/VF cardiac arrest — only 4.3% of 347 OHCA patients were eligible, ECPR was activated in 66.7% of eligible patients, and 40% of the activation group survived to discharge with good neurological outcome.
-
Video dispatcher CPR no better than phone
Cluster-randomized trial of 108 OHCA patients compared video-assisted dispatcher CPR instruction with conventional telephone instruction, finding no difference in bystander CPR rates (87.3% vs 92.5%, p=0.53) or ongoing CPR at EMS arrival, but significantly lower protocol compliance in the telemedicine group.
-
Mitochondrial therapies after ROSC
No abstract available — title suggests exploration of mitochondrial-directed therapies after return of spontaneous circulation.
-
Conventional CPR best for drowning OHCA
Retrospective cohort of 3914 drowning-related OHCA patients found conventional CPR (compressions with rescue breaths) was associated with higher 1-month survival compared with hands-only CPR (24.1% vs 9.4%), and both were superior to no CPR (2.7%).