Home Cardiac arrest Conventional CPR best for drowning OHCA
Cardiac arrest
Conventional CPR best for drowning OHCA
Effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation type on 1-month survival in drowning following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in natural water bodies: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
Resuscitation · Added 29 July 2026
Retrospective cohort of 3914 drowning-related OHCA patients found conventional CPR (compressions with rescue breaths) was associated with higher 1-month survival compared with hands-only CPR (24.1% vs 9.4%), and both were superior to no CPR (2.7%).
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Retrospective nationwide registry cohort (Utstein, Japan 2016-2022)
- Participants
- 3914 drowning-related OHCAs in natural water bodies
- Main finding
- 1-month survival: no bystander CPR 2.7%, hands-only CPR 9.4%, conventional CPR 24.1%. Versus no CPR, conventional CPR AOR 3.70 (95% CI 2.31-5.93), hands-only AOR 1.74 (1.19-2.54); conventional CPR superior to hands-only (AOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.41-3.23).
- Caveat
- Retrospective registry data with residual confounding and only 232 patients (5.9%) receiving conventional CPR.
- Bottom line
- Supports current practice
Learning goal
Understand how drowning physiology shapes the choice between conventional and compression-only bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 29 July 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Physician-led prehospital ECPR: small eligible subset
Observational cohort testing an EMS physician-led prehospital ECPR activation protocol for refractory VT/VF cardiac arrest — only 4.3% of 347 OHCA patients were eligible, ECPR was activated in 66.7% of eligible patients, and 40% of the activation group survived to discharge with good neurological outcome.
-
Video dispatcher CPR no better than phone
Cluster-randomized trial of 108 OHCA patients compared video-assisted dispatcher CPR instruction with conventional telephone instruction, finding no difference in bystander CPR rates (87.3% vs 92.5%, p=0.53) or ongoing CPR at EMS arrival, but significantly lower protocol compliance in the telemedicine group.
-
Sex-specific defibrillation findings defended
Author response to criticism of sex-specific findings in the DOSE VF trial, defending the methodology and arguing biological plausibility for differential effects of manual pressure augmentation.
-
Mitochondrial therapies after ROSC
No abstract available — title suggests exploration of mitochondrial-directed therapies after return of spontaneous circulation.