Home Other Simulated EMS care held up at altitude
Other
Simulated EMS care held up at altitude
Quality of prehospital emergency care at high altitude (3,450 m) by non-acclimatised EMS physicians: a randomised assessor-blinded simulation crossover study
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2026-10-30 · Added 31 October 2026
In a Swiss randomised crossover simulation study, 20 non-acclimatised EMS physicians showed no significant drop in overall performance at 3,450 m altitude (composite 82% at baseline vs 74% acute exposure, p=0.082).
- Study type
- Simulation
- Design
- Assessor-blinded randomised crossover simulation study (physician-staffed crews)
- Participants
- 20 non-acclimatised EMS physicians (17 analysed)
- Main finding
- Median composite performance 82% at baseline, 74% during acute exposure to 3,450 m, 82% with supplemental oxygen at 4 L/min, and 83% after 20 hours at altitude; overall difference not significant (p=0.082)
- Caveat
- Simulation only, 17 of 20 physicians completed all conditions, and the study crewed doctors rather than paramedics
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). A physician-staffed Swiss model, but hypobaric hypoxia affects any crew working helicopter rescue or alpine retrieval, which parts of Australia do.
Learning goal
Recognise how acute altitude exposure affects my own clinical performance and when supplemental oxygen protects decision-making.
More
- Topic: Other
- Daily scan: 31 October 2026
Related papers on Other
-
Few heat-stroke cooling devices suit the prehospital setting
A US systematic review of 18 commercial heat-stroke cooling devices found only three reached the ideal prehospital cooling rate (at least 0.155°C/min) and just five met single-person portability, with most relying on water, power or disposables.
-
Cluster trials read differently to individual ones
Meta-epidemiological study of 65 meta-analyses (212 trials, 315,276 patients) comparing cluster-randomised with individually randomised trials in prehospital, emergency and critical care — no difference in mortality effect estimates, but cluster trials reported significantly smaller effect sizes for length-of-stay-type outcomes.
-
Prehospital ultrasound as a decision tool
Structured narrative review of 38 articles on prehospital POCUS across cardiac arrest, shock, dyspnoea, trauma, paediatric and obstetric uses — it can identify reversible causes in arrest, characterise shock and support trauma triage and destination decisions, but limited sensitivity means it can't rule anything out.
-
AU/NZ emergency care research priorities being set
ACEM's Clinical Trials Network, with the James Lind Alliance, has launched a priority setting partnership to set the emergency care research agenda for Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand for the next 5–10 years.