Paramedic Papers

Home Trauma Swedish bleeding control guidelines scored low on quality

Trauma

Swedish bleeding control guidelines scored low on quality

Assessing Swedish guidelines for prehospital bleeding control: a cross-sectional appraisal using AGREE II
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2026-10-30 · Added 31 October 2026

A Swedish cross-sectional appraisal of regional prehospital bleeding-control guidelines from 15 of 21 regions using AGREE II found low methodological quality overall, with rigour of development and editorial independence scoring poorly.

Study type
Cross-sectional
Design
Cross-sectional AGREE II appraisal of regional clinical practice guidelines
Participants
Guidelines from 15 Swedish healthcare regions
Main finding
Clarity of presentation scored highest; rigour of development, stakeholder involvement, applicability and editorial independence scored poorly; most guidelines lacked evidence search strategies, evidence links and update procedures
Caveat
Appraised document quality only, with no link to patient outcomes
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). A Swedish guideline appraisal, but it speaks to how any ambulance service builds, links to evidence and maintains its clinical guidance, including here.

Learning goal

Understand how guideline development rigour affects the trustworthiness of prehospital bleeding control recommendations I follow.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI)

More

Related papers on Trauma