Paramedic Papers

Home Workforce & wellbeing How common are blood-borne infections in first responders

Workforce & wellbeing

How common are blood-borne infections in first responders

Pooled prevalence of infectious diseases among first responders in the prehospital setting: A systematic review with meta-analysis by occupation
Prehospital Emergency Care · 2026-11-10 · Added 12 November 2026

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies covering 19,188 prehospital first responders estimated pooled infection prevalence — hepatitis B 6.2%, hepatitis C 1.8%, MRSA colonisation about 4%, and COVID-19 13.6% in unvaccinated staff.

Study type
Systematic review
Design
Systematic review with random-effects meta-analysis (88 full texts screened, 22 studies included)
Participants
19,188 first responders across 22 studies
Main finding
Pooled prevalence: hepatitis B 6.2% (95% CI 4.5–8.2), hepatitis C 1.8% (0.9–2.9), MRSA colonisation ~4% (2.6–5.9), COVID-19 among unvaccinated staff 13.6% (4.8–25.9), falling to 7.3% after excluding high-bias studies
Caveat
Very high heterogeneity across the 22 studies, and the pooled estimates mix paramedics with police and firefighters
Bottom line
Supports current practice

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Occupational exposure risk is the same in uncontrolled prehospital environments everywhere — this is the evidence base behind PPE, vaccination and infection-control protocols Australian crews already work under.

Learning goal

Understand how occupational exposure risks for blood-borne infections shape my infection prevention and vaccination practice.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Workforce & wellbeing