Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac (non-arrest) Electrical capture uncommon in prehospital transcutaneous pacing

Cardiac (non-arrest)

Electrical capture uncommon in prehospital transcutaneous pacing

Transcutaneous Pacing in the Prehospital Setting – A Retrospective Cohort Study of Electrical Capture
Prehospital Emergency Care · 2026-11-03 · Added 5 November 2026

A US EMS agency reviewed continuous monitor ECGs from 56 patients given prehospital transcutaneous pacing between 2017 and 2024 and found electrical capture in only 32%, often intermittent, with clinician-verbalised pulses coinciding with capture in just 15% of instances.

Study type
Cohort
Design
Retrospective cohort with continuous ECG review
Participants
56 patients who received prehospital transcutaneous pacing
Main finding
Electrical capture in 18/56 (32%); among capturers, complete capture occurred only 27.2% of pacing time; median SBP change +22 mmHg with capture vs 0 mmHg without (p=0.031); clinician-verbalised pulse coincided with electrical capture in only 4/26 (15%) instances
Caveat
Single US agency, small sample, and capture judged from monitor recordings rather than patient-centred outcomes
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). Transcutaneous pacing is carried by only a handful of Australian services, so this speaks most directly to the services that pace rather than day-to-day practice everywhere.

Learning goal

Strengthen my judgement on when prehospital transcutaneous pacing is likely to achieve electrical capture and meaningful perfusion.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac (non-arrest)