Paramedic Papers

Home Stroke & neuro Prehospital stroke triage: high under- and overtriage rates

Stroke & neuro

Prehospital stroke triage: high under- and overtriage rates

Performance of the Lausanne Ischemic Stroke Pathway prehospital triage system in identifying acute reperfusion candidates: a quality-control study
Swiss Medical Weekly · 2026-10-29 · Added 3 November 2026

A Swiss single-centre quality-control study of a prehospital stroke triage pathway found EMS undertriaged 21% and overtriaged 63% of acute reperfusion candidates, with both rates falling when a coordinated medical team (including a neurologist) was phone-consulted.

Study type
Cohort
Design
Retrospective single-centre quality-control study
Participants
1,071 patients with suspected acute ischaemic stroke
Main finding
41% were eligible for reperfusion; EMS undertriage 21%, overtriage 63%; the physician-led call-team step reduced undertriage to 11% and overtriage to 57%
Caveat
Physician-staffed call-team model is not how Australian dispatch works, and single-centre retrospective design
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). The second-assessment step rests on a physician-staffed call team Australian services don't run, but the under- and overtriage rates are a useful benchmark for our own stroke screens.

Learning goal

Refine my prehospital stroke assessment to better identify patients suitable for acute reperfusion and reduce undertriage.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Stroke & neuro