Home Trauma HEMS vs road: guideline adherence in trauma
Trauma
HEMS vs road: guideline adherence in trauma
Guideline adherence in helicopter versus ground emergency medical services: an indication-based analysis of 129,783 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · 2026-10-21 · Added 24 October 2026
Retrospective analysis of 129,783 severely injured patients in the German TraumaRegister DGU (physician-staffed helicopter and ground services) found HEMS patients, who were younger and more severely injured, had higher rates of guideline-recommended prehospital interventions, such as advanced airway in impaired consciousness (96.5% vs 82.9%) and prehospital chest drains (14.0% vs 5.5%).
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Retrospective multicentre registry cohort (TraumaRegister DGU, 2016–2024); both arms physician-staffed
- Participants
- 129,783 adults with severe trauma (25% HEMS)
- Main finding
- HEMS patients had higher guideline-recommended intervention rates in every indication subgroup (advanced airway in impaired consciousness 96.5% vs 82.9%; prehospital chest tube 14.0% vs 5.5%); HEMS patients were also younger and more severely injured
- Caveat
- Both arms physician-staffed; descriptive analysis with no adjustment for injury severity or scene factors, so sicker HEMS patients may explain part of the gap
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). A physician-staffed model, and chest drains sit beyond Australian paramedic scope while advanced airway is an intensive care paramedic skill in most services — but the helicopter-utilisation question is live here too.
Learning goal
Understand how transport mode and scene factors influence adherence to trauma care guidelines in Australia.
More
- Topic: Trauma
- Daily scan: 24 October 2026
- Podcast: Paramedic Papers Daily, 24 October 2026
Related papers on Trauma
-
Prehospital pulse pressure flags trauma bleeding
A retrospective study of 2,177 adult trauma patients across three Canadian level 1 trauma centres found prehospital pulse pressure predicted active haemorrhage (AUC 0.73), with each 10 mmHg narrowing raising the odds by 51% and a cut-off of ≤45 mmHg most useful for ruling bleeding out.
-
No unique GCS 8 threshold for intubation
A two-era Japan Trauma Data Bank analysis of roughly 138,000 adults found recorded intubation more likely at GCS 8 than 9, but no evidence of a unique risk threshold at that boundary.
-
Mass casualty care: slower but no deadlier
A matched German trauma-registry cohort (423 severely injured MCI patients vs 1,692 routine controls) found mass-casualty patients waited longer on scene (85 vs 67 minutes) and received more intubation and tranexamic acid, yet in-hospital mortality was similar (13.5% vs 11.7%).
-
Whole blood on ambulances: first two years
The first two years of a prehospital low-titre O-positive whole blood program in Oklahoma (71.6% penetrating trauma) showed significantly improved prehospital vital signs after paramedic transfusion, with improved systolic blood pressure tied to higher survival to hospital arrival.