Paramedic Papers

Home Trauma HEMS vs road: guideline adherence in trauma

Trauma

HEMS vs road: guideline adherence in trauma

Guideline adherence in helicopter versus ground emergency medical services: an indication-based analysis of 129,783 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · 2026-10-21 · Added 24 October 2026

Retrospective analysis of 129,783 severely injured patients in the German TraumaRegister DGU (physician-staffed helicopter and ground services) found HEMS patients, who were younger and more severely injured, had higher rates of guideline-recommended prehospital interventions, such as advanced airway in impaired consciousness (96.5% vs 82.9%) and prehospital chest drains (14.0% vs 5.5%).

Study type
Registry
Design
Retrospective multicentre registry cohort (TraumaRegister DGU, 2016–2024); both arms physician-staffed
Participants
129,783 adults with severe trauma (25% HEMS)
Main finding
HEMS patients had higher guideline-recommended intervention rates in every indication subgroup (advanced airway in impaired consciousness 96.5% vs 82.9%; prehospital chest tube 14.0% vs 5.5%); HEMS patients were also younger and more severely injured
Caveat
Both arms physician-staffed; descriptive analysis with no adjustment for injury severity or scene factors, so sicker HEMS patients may explain part of the gap
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). A physician-staffed model, and chest drains sit beyond Australian paramedic scope while advanced airway is an intensive care paramedic skill in most services — but the helicopter-utilisation question is live here too.

Learning goal

Understand how transport mode and scene factors influence adherence to trauma care guidelines in Australia.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Trauma