Home Cardiac arrest Fatigue common a year after cardiac arrest
Cardiac arrest
Fatigue common a year after cardiac arrest
Fatigue, Anxiety and Depression 12 Months After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Population Based Cohort Study
Resuscitation · 2026-10 · Added 22 October 2026
A Victorian population-based cohort of 728 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors found fatigue in 35.8%, anxiety in 22.6% and depression in 18.0% at 12 months, with heavier symptom burden linked to worse quality of life, function and return to work.
- Study type
- Cohort
- Design
- Prospective population-based cohort
- Participants
- 728 OHCA survivors (68.2% of those eligible) interviewed at 12 months in Victoria
- Main finding
- Fatigue 35.8%, anxiety 22.6%, depression 18.0%; fatigue exceeded population norms (SMD 0.64) and higher symptom burden tracked with worse EQ-5D, GOSE and return-to-work rates
- Caveat
- Self-reported symptoms with about a third of eligible survivors lost to follow-up
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Australian registry data on what happens to the patients we resuscitate, and survivorship aftercare is a live question for every service running cardiac arrest follow-up pathways.
Learning goal
Recognise fatigue, anxiety and depression as common post-cardiac arrest survivors' needs when supporting recovery and follow-up.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 22 October 2026
- Podcast: Paramedic Papers Daily, 22 October 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Shorter pulse checks linked to more ROSC
A 252-patient quasi-randomised multicentre study in Türkiye found pulse checks completed within 5 seconds were associated with roughly double the ROSC rate of checks lasting 6–10 seconds (36.3% vs 19.5%, OR 2.39), alongside better capnographic dynamics.
-
Physician-directed ALS: no survival gain
A 129,207-case Korean difference-in-differences study found regions adopting video physician-directed prehospital ALS for cardiac arrest had modestly higher prehospital ROSC (+1.35 percentage points) but no gain in survival or neurological outcome, with prehospital times stretching about 4 minutes.
-
Pad application is the AED time bottleneck
Timestamps from 8,115 remotely monitored Japanese AEDs showed pad application consumed a median 81% of the power-on-to-first-analysis interval, with completion inside about 50 seconds marking shocks delivered within 60 seconds of power-on.
-
Dispatcher training + volunteer app: more CPR, no outcome gain
A stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in French EMS agencies found dispatcher training in arrest recognition, telephone CPR and a geolocated volunteer responder app was associated with more bystander CPR (61.4% to 70.9%, adjusted OR 1.54), an effect that lost significance after adjusting for secular trends; clinical outcomes did not improve.