Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest Predicting outcomes in PEA cardiac arrest

Cardiac arrest

Predicting outcomes in PEA cardiac arrest

Prehospital predictors of clinical outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity: a JCS-ReSS report
Resuscitation Plus · 2026-09-28 · Added 20 October 2026

A nationwide Japanese registry study of 442,630 adults with PEA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest found witnessed arrest and shorter response times predicted good neurological outcome at the scene, prehospital ROSC was the strongest predictor at hospital arrival (RR 23.31), and conversion to a shockable rhythm helped only in cardiac PEA while apparently harming non-cardiac PEA.

Study type
Registry
Design
Nationwide registry cohort with time-dependent propensity score sequential matching
Participants
442,630 adults with OHCA and initial rhythm PEA
Main finding
Witnessed arrest (RR 1.65) and prehospital ROSC (RR 23.31) predicted favourable neurological outcome at 1 month; rhythm conversion predicted good outcome in cardiac PEA but poor outcome in non-cardiac PEA (RR 0.73); apparent harm from adrenaline and advanced airway management attenuated after time-dependent adjustment
Caveat
Prognostic associations from a registry — aetiology was presumed, not confirmed, and no causality can be inferred for the rhythm-conversion findings
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). PEA arrests are a daily reality for Australian crews, and adrenaline and advanced airways are standard tools across Australian ambulance services, so the prognostic signals map directly onto practice here.

Learning goal

Strengthen my judgement on prognosticating outcomes when managing pulseless electrical activity in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest