Paramedic Papers

Home Workforce & wellbeing Validating a moral distress scale for paramedics

Workforce & wellbeing

Validating a moral distress scale for paramedics

Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Moral Distress Scale for Prehospital Emergency Health Services Employees: The Case of Türkiye
Journal of Religion and Health · 2026-10-14 · Added 16 October 2026

Turkish researchers validated a Turkish-language Moral Distress Scale in 215 prehospital emergency clinicians, confirming a five-factor, 20-item structure with high internal consistency (α = 0.90).

Study type
Cross-sectional
Design
Cross-sectional psychometric validation (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis)
Participants
215 prehospital emergency healthcare professionals
Main finding
Five-factor 20-item structure confirmed with acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.89) and high internal consistency (α = 0.90)
Caveat
Single-country cultural adaptation with no test of responsiveness over time or in other systems
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). The instrument is Turkish, but moral distress from rapid decisions with limited resources is a universal feature of ambulance work and this adds to the small pool of prehospital-specific measures.

Learning goal

Understand how moral distress presents in prehospital practice and how it shapes clinician wellbeing and retention.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Workforce & wellbeing