Paramedic Papers

Home Stroke & neuro Stroke triage tools: cost-effective, hard to sustain

Stroke & neuro

Stroke triage tools: cost-effective, hard to sustain

Health Economic & Implementation Determinants of Prehospital Stroke Triage Tools: A Systematic Review
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · 2026-10 · Added 6 October 2026

Systematic review of prehospital stroke triage tools (mobile stroke units, telemedicine, biomarkers, AI) found most reports of cost-effectiveness positive, but sustained implementation is limited by complexity, workflow fit and costs.

Study type
Systematic review
Design
Systematic review of health economic and implementation studies
Participants
31 studies (13 with health economic outcomes, 18 with implementation determinants)
Main finding
Of 6,491 screened studies, 31 were included (14 mobile stroke units, 13 telemedicine); positive cost-effectiveness was reported in 11 studies, but evidence on sustained implementation was limited and barriers included innovation complexity, role delineation, workflow compatibility, IT infrastructure and costs
Caveat
Narrative synthesis of heterogeneous study designs; only 13 of 31 studies reported health economic outcomes
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). Mobile stroke units and prehospital telemedicine run in only a handful of Australian regions, so this informs the investment debate more than everyday practice.

Learning goal

Understand the system factors that shape sustainable and cost-effective prehospital stroke triage.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Stroke & neuro