Paramedic Papers

Home Operations & systems Bigger crews work faster, don't save more

Operations & systems

Bigger crews work faster, don't save more

Impact of the emergency medical services crew size (2 vs. ≥3 personnel) on prehospital performance and survival in severe trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Korea
Journal of Trauma and Injury · 2026-09-30 · Added 3 October 2026

Korean nationwide cohort of 78,203 severe trauma patients found crews of three or more achieved better prehospital IV access (aOR 1.47) and scene times ≤10 minutes (aOR 1.09) than two-person crews, with no survival difference after adjustment.

Study type
Registry
Design
Retrospective nationwide registry cohort
Participants
78,203 adults with field-classified severe trauma
Main finding
≥3-person crews: IV access in hypotensive patients aOR 1.47 (95% CI 1.31–1.66), scene time ≤10 min aOR 1.09, advanced airway borderline (aOR 1.13); survival to discharge unchanged after adjustment (aOR 1.00)
Caveat
Korean EMS staffing, transport distances and skill sets differ from Australian models, and residual confounding is likely
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). Two-person crews are the Australian norm and Korean EMS carries a different skill mix, but this is among the largest evidence yet on what a third crew member buys procedurally — without a survival gain.

Learning goal

Understand how crew staffing models shape prehospital trauma performance and survival outcomes in the Australian context.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Operations & systems