Paramedic Papers

Home Education & training Knowledge gaps in local anaesthetic dosing and LAST

Education & training

Knowledge gaps in local anaesthetic dosing and LAST

Local Anaesthetic Dosing and Toxicity Knowledge in Australian Emergency Departments: A Multicentre Cross‐Sectional Survey
Emergency Medicine Australasia · Added 15 September 2026

Multicentre survey of 114 emergency clinicians across three Queensland EDs — fewer than half correctly identified the recommended maximum dose for any of four local anaesthetics, 21.9% couldn't recall any features of LAST, and only 10.5% could state the lipid emulsion dosing regimen.

Study type
Cross-sectional
Design
Multicentre cross-sectional survey
Participants
114 emergency clinicians at three Queensland EDs
Main finding
Fewer than half correctly identified the recommended maximum dose for any of four local anaesthetics (18.4% for bupivacaine to 48.2% for lidocaine); 21.9% could not recall any features of LAST; 57.9% identified lipid emulsion therapy but only 10.5% stated a dosing regimen.
Caveat
ED clinician survey only (not paramedics), self-reported recall, three Queensland sites.
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). transferability — awareness-level for paramedics: lignocaine is ICP-only in ACTAS and lipid emulsion isn't carried, so management stays hospital-side

Learning goal

Strengthen my ability to recognise local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and apply safe maximum dosing in prehospital wound care.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Education & training