Home Trauma Prehospital pelvic binders don't cut transfusion
Trauma
Prehospital pelvic binders don't cut transfusion
Prehospital pelvic binder use and transfusion requirements in patients with pelvic fractures: A nationwide propensity-matched cohort study
Injury · Added 27 July 2026
In this nationwide propensity-matched cohort of patients with blunt pelvic fractures, prehospital pelvic binder use was not associated with reduced 24-hour transfusion requirements or in-hospital mortality, but was associated with a higher rate of pelvic angioembolization.
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Retrospective nationwide registry cohort with propensity matching
- Participants
- 10,332 adults with blunt pelvic fractures; 182 binder users vs 546 matched controls
- Main finding
- No difference in 24-hour RBC transfusion (median 2.0 vs 0.0 units; P=0.486) or in-hospital mortality; binder use associated with higher pelvic angioembolisation rate (33.0% vs 21.2%; OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.24-2.66)
- Caveat
- Only 1.8% received prehospital binders, suggesting selection and confounding by indication despite matching; Japanese system
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Learning goal
Weigh the benefits and limitations of prehospital pelvic binder application in unstable pelvic fracture patients.
More
- Topic: Trauma
- Daily scan: 27 July 2026
Related papers on Trauma
-
Tools for assessing trauma team leadership
Leadership is a key non‑technical determinant of trauma team performance and is associated with adherence to protocols and patient outcomes.
-
Adrenaline in traumatic cardiac arrest survival
Prehospital epinephrine administration in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest was associated with increased survival to hospital discharge and prehospital ROSC.
-
Nordic ICU outcomes in traumatic brain injury
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability, with large variations in management strategies and outcomes across countries.
-
Sex and gender disparities in trauma care
Study on: Need-standardised comparisons must not become a barrier to recognising and addressing sex and gender disparities in major trauma care. No abstract available for detailed assessment.