Home Airway & ventilation Miller vs Macintosh blade in paediatric intubation
Airway & ventilation
Miller vs Macintosh blade in paediatric intubation
Initial Laryngoscope Blade Selection and Outcomes in Paediatric Emergency Department Intubations: Miller vs. Macintosh
Emergency Medicine Australasia · Added 27 July 2026
In this cohort of young children intubated in the ED, Macintosh blade use was associated with higher FPS and fewer hypoxic events compared with Miller blade.
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Prospectively collected registry cohort (ANZEDAR)
- Participants
- 201 children under 5 intubated in ED
- Main finding
- Macintosh blades had higher FPS (80.5% vs 63.6%; OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22–0.80) and lower hypoxia (17.7% vs 33.0%; OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.19–4.46) than Miller; hypotension rates did not differ
- Caveat
- Miller-blade children were substantially younger, making age a significant confounder; in-hospital ED setting
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Learning goal
Weigh the choice of curved versus straight laryngoscope blades when intubating young children, considering age-related factors.
More
- Topic: Airway & ventilation
- Daily scan: 27 July 2026
Related papers on Airway & ventilation
-
High adverse event rate after prehospital RSI
Investigates the prevalence of adverse events following prehospital airway management using neuromuscular blockade
-
Mechanical vs manual ventilation in CPR equal
This systematic review of 13 articles (six RCTs, seven non-randomised studies) found very low to low certainty evidence showing no significant difference in ROSC between volume-controlled mechanical ventilation and manual ventilation during CPR.
-
Awake intubation by emergency physicians feasible
In this preliminary single-center study, emergency physicians performed awake intubation with relatively high incidence, high overall success, and low rates of major adverse events.
-
Hypopharyngeal perforation after King laryngeal tube
Hypopharyngeal perforation is a rare but serious complication of prehospital King laryngeal tube placement.