Home Airway & ventilation Awake intubation by emergency physicians feasible
Airway & ventilation
Awake intubation by emergency physicians feasible
Incidence and Outcomes of Emergency Physician-Performed Awake Intubations: A Report From the Airway Interventions Registry and Observational Database
Annals of Emergency Medicine · Added 27 July 2026
In this preliminary single-center study, emergency physicians performed awake intubation with relatively high incidence, high overall success, and low rates of major adverse events.
- Study type
- Other
- Design
- Prospective single-centre airway registry analysis
- Participants
- 87 adult awake intubations among 1,213 ED intubations over 10 years
- Main finding
- 7.2% of intubations were awake intubations; success without major adverse event 92% (95% CI 86–98%), first-pass success 71%, RSI conversion 6.9%; critical hypoxaemia 3%, critical hypotension 2%, cardiac arrest 2%.
- Caveat
- Single tertiary-centre study; small numbers and no comparator group
- Bottom line
- Context only
Learning goal
Strengthen my judgement on when awake intubation offers a safer prehospital airway strategy in predicted difficult airways.
More
- Topic: Airway & ventilation
- Daily scan: 27 July 2026
Related papers on Airway & ventilation
-
High adverse event rate after prehospital RSI
Investigates the prevalence of adverse events following prehospital airway management using neuromuscular blockade
-
Mechanical vs manual ventilation in CPR equal
This systematic review of 13 articles (six RCTs, seven non-randomised studies) found very low to low certainty evidence showing no significant difference in ROSC between volume-controlled mechanical ventilation and manual ventilation during CPR.
-
Miller vs Macintosh blade in paediatric intubation
In this cohort of young children intubated in the ED, Macintosh blade use was associated with higher FPS and fewer hypoxic events compared with Miller blade.
-
Hypopharyngeal perforation after King laryngeal tube
Hypopharyngeal perforation is a rare but serious complication of prehospital King laryngeal tube placement.