Home Pain & sedation Droperidol for nausea: low adverse event rate
Pain & sedation
Droperidol for nausea: low adverse event rate
Incidence of Adverse Events with Prehospital Use of Droperidol for Nausea or Vomiting
Prehospital Emergency Care · Added 28 May 2026
This study evaluated adverse events associated with prehospital droperidol use for nausea or vomiting — the incidence of clinically significant adverse events was low, suggesting droperidol may be safe for prehospital use.
- Study type
- Cohort
- Design
- Retrospective observational cohort, convenience sample
- Participants
- 284 patients given prehospital droperidol for nausea/vomiting across 29 EMS agencies
- Main finding
- 15.5% had at least one adverse event, most commonly decreased mentation (8.5%); hypoxia in 6.7% (mostly older adults, 13.2%); 90.1% received 1.25 mg; sedation incidence similar in older vs other adults.
- Caveat
- Convenience sample, retrospective design, and no comparison with other antiemetics
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Learning goal
Weigh the risks of droperidol for nausea against alternative antiemetics, particularly in older adults.
More
- Topic: Pain & sedation
- Daily scan: 28 May 2026
Related papers on Pain & sedation
-
Procedural sedation consensus: oversight & quality
Multidisciplinary Delphi consensus guidelines covering principles, oversight, and quality monitoring for unscheduled procedural sedation.
-
Intranasal equals subcutaneous ketamine for pain
RCT testing whether intranasal ketamine is non-inferior to subcutaneous for acute traumatic pain — both routes provided equivalent analgesia with minimal clinically important differences, though minor adverse events were more common with subcutaneous administration.
-
Early non-IV analgesia in prehospital trauma
Study on: Early non-intravenous analgesia in prehospital trauma care: time to act. No abstract available for detailed assessment.
-
No benefit from prophylaxis for opioid nausea
Prospective study of 205 HEMS patients comparing ondansetron prophylaxis, aromatherapy, and no prophylaxis for opioid-induced nausea — neither intervention showed benefit compared to no prophylaxis in unselected patients.