Paramedic Papers

Home Pain & sedation No benefit from prophylaxis for opioid nausea

Pain & sedation

No benefit from prophylaxis for opioid nausea

Prophylaxis of opioid-induced nausea in helicopter emergency medical service: a prospective quasi-experimental study
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · Added 7 May 2026

Prospective study of 205 HEMS patients comparing ondansetron prophylaxis, aromatherapy, and no prophylaxis for opioid-induced nausea — neither intervention showed benefit compared to no prophylaxis in unselected patients.

Study type
Cohort
Design
Prospective quasi-experimental rotating-schedule study across six HEMS bases
Participants
205 patients >16 given opioids for traumatic pain (86 no prophylaxis, 64 ondansetron, 55 aromatherapy)
Main finding
Median NRS change 0 in all groups; NRS increase in 15%, 14%, 15%; NRS>3 in 14% vs 11% vs 11%; vomiting 4%, 2%, 0%. Neither ondansetron nor aromatherapy showed benefit over no prophylaxis.
Caveat
Quasi-experimental rotating allocation, single HEMS system, modest sample size
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Learning goal

Weigh whether routine antiemetic prophylaxis is warranted when giving opioids for traumatic pain in the prehospital setting.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Pain & sedation