Home Cardiac arrest IV vs IO in OHCA: long-term outcomes similar
Cardiac arrest
IV vs IO in OHCA: long-term outcomes similar
Effect of vascular access strategy on long-term outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised clinical trial
Resuscitation · Added 30 April 2026
IVIO follow-up comparing initial intraosseous versus intravenous access in adult non-traumatic OHCA — 6-month and 1-year outcomes were similar, with no evidence that either access strategy improves long-term survival or neurological outcome.
- Study type
- RCT
- Design
- Follow-up of the IVIO randomised clinical trial
- Participants
- 1,479 adults with non-traumatic OHCA
- Main finding
- At 1 year, survival 11% (IO) vs 9% (IV), RR 1.24 (95% CI 0.91–1.67); favourable neurological outcome 10% vs 8%, RR 1.28 (95% CI 0.93–1.77); mean EQ-5D-5L score 83 vs 76 (difference 7, 95% CI 1–13)
- Caveat
- Non-significant point estimates favouring IO; survivors-only quality-of-life comparison may be underpowered
- Bottom line
- Supports current practice
Learning goal
Weigh the long-term benefits and risks of intraosseous versus intravenous access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 30 April 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Paramedics accurate withholding CPR in traumatic arrest
Retrospective Ontario review testing how paramedics decide to withhold CPR in traumatic cardiac arrest — most no-CPR decisions were based on signs clearly incompatible with life, and post-mortem findings supported paramedic assessment in the large majority of cases.
-
Expedited OHCA transport costs similar to standard
Greater Sydney costing analysis of expedited OHCA transport for possible ECPR versus standard care — overall health system costs were comparable, with higher costs when patients arrived during ECPR business hours.
-
AP pad position, not current, predicts ROSC
Secondary analysis of DOSE VF examined whether transthoracic current, pad position, and ROSC were linked, and found AP pad placement delivered higher current and was independently associated with ROSC, while delivered current itself was not.
-
Pacing artefact can mask VF during TCP
Case series examining the problem of ventricular arrhythmias occurring during TCP and delays to defibrillation — highlights the clinical trap of pacing artefact masking VF and the need to pause pacing to identify shockable rhythms.