Home Cardiac arrest Paramedics accurate withholding CPR in traumatic arrest
Cardiac arrest
Paramedics accurate withholding CPR in traumatic arrest
Paramedics' decisions to withhold resuscitation in traumatic cardiac arrest: accuracy of paramedic assessments compared with autopsy findings
Prehospital Emergency Care · Added 5 May 2026
Retrospective Ontario review testing how paramedics decide to withhold CPR in traumatic cardiac arrest — most no-CPR decisions were based on signs clearly incompatible with life, and post-mortem findings supported paramedic assessment in the large majority of cases.
- Study type
- Cohort
- Design
- Retrospective coroner case file review
- Participants
- 90 prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest cases without CPR
- Main finding
- 61% had documented injuries incompatible with life or signs of irreversible death; postmortem confirmed incompatible injuries in 89% of these. Of 35 cases withholding CPR on other grounds, 83% had postmortem injuries making arrest irreversible.
- Caveat
- Retrospective, single region (Ontario, Canada) with only cases where CPR was withheld and EMS records available
- Bottom line
- Supports current practice
Learning goal
Strengthen my judgement on withholding resuscitation in traumatic cardiac arrest using signs incompatible with life.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 5 May 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Forehead EEG feasible in postanoxic coma
Comparison of forehead EEG electrodes versus conventional EEG in 51 postanoxic coma patients found forehead recordings were interpretable in 74.1% of cases with moderate agreement, suggesting potential as a screening tool to reduce technician workload.
-
Carotid Doppler parameters linked to ROSC
-
Expedited OHCA transport costs similar to standard
Greater Sydney costing analysis of expedited OHCA transport for possible ECPR versus standard care — overall health system costs were comparable, with higher costs when patients arrived during ECPR business hours.
-
IV vs IO in OHCA: long-term outcomes similar
IVIO follow-up comparing initial intraosseous versus intravenous access in adult non-traumatic OHCA — 6-month and 1-year outcomes were similar, with no evidence that either access strategy improves long-term survival or neurological outcome.