Home Trauma Trauma undertriage still high in Tromsø
Trauma
Trauma undertriage still high in Tromsø
Trauma undertriage at a University Hospital in North Norway: the need to look beyond mechanism of injury
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · Added 20 August 2026
Retrospective registry study assessing trauma undertriage using ISS ≥16 and NISS ≥16 as reference — found 15% undertriage (above the recommended <5%), with 63% of undertriaged patients meeting national criteria but not receiving trauma team activation, mostly low-energy falls.
- Study type
- Registry
- Design
- Retrospective local trauma registry review
- Participants
- 527 trauma patients (2018 and 2023)
- Main finding
- Undertriage 15% by ISS≥16 and 18% by NISS≥16, exceeding recommended <5%; 63% of undertriaged patients met national trauma team activation criteria; 73% involved low-energy falls
- Caveat
- Single Scandinavian university hospital; retrospective design
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Relevant to Australian paramedics triaging trauma patients; low-energy falls are common presentations and this highlights risks of undertriage.
Learning goal
Strengthen my judgement on when older patients with low-energy falls warrant trauma team activation despite unremarkable mechanisms.
More
- Topic: Trauma
- Daily scan: 20 August 2026
Related papers on Trauma
-
Whole blood vs components in prehospital trauma
Review compared whole blood versus component therapy for out-of-hospital trauma resuscitation — direct clinical relevance for prehospital blood product protocols.
-
Trauma quality improvement opportunities by cohort
Registry-based cohort study of 8,298 trauma patients found that blunt multisystem cohorts had the highest opportunities-for-improvement rates (10.6% with TBI, 16.9% without) across multiple quality domains including potentially preventable deaths and clinical judgement errors.
-
Prehospital NEWS beats shock index in trauma
Systematic review of 22 studies (184 to 1.4M patients) found prehospital NEWS showed excellent discrimination for short-term mortality (AUROC 0.87-0.96) and reliably predicted transfusion needs, outperforming Shock Index.
-
Prehospital whole blood improves shock physiology
Systematic review of 13 studies found prehospital whole blood consistently improved shock physiology (greater SI reduction, higher shock reversal rates) and showed potential survival benefit in high-risk and penetrating trauma patients, though overall mortality benefit was not uniform.