Paramedic Papers

Home Trauma Stable penetrating chest trauma: surgery increasingly avoided

Trauma

Stable penetrating chest trauma: surgery increasingly avoided

Management of hemodynamically stable penetrating chest trauma without cardiac injury in Marseille
BMC Emergency Medicine · 2026-10-11 · Added 12 October 2026

Ten-year retrospective review of 268 haemodynamically stable penetrating chest injuries in Marseille, where non-operative management was attempted in 78% and failed in fewer than 9%, with hospital stay falling from 7.6 to 5.2 days in the recent period.

Study type
Cohort
Design
Retrospective multicentre cohort
Participants
268 haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating chest trauma sparing the cardiac box
Main finding
Initial non-operative management in 78% of patients; failure rates low and unchanged between periods (8.5% vs 6.5%), with hospital length of stay dropping from 7.6 to 5.2 days after mid-2020
Caveat
Retrospective single-city cohort dominated by stab wounds (86%), so selection criteria for non-operative management aren't transferable to other settings
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Low relevance). The management decision sits entirely in-hospital — this is context on where stable penetrating chest injuries end up, not a prehospital scope question.

Learning goal

Weigh the safety and limits of non-operative management for stable penetrating chest trauma in the Australian prehospital context.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI)

More

Related papers on Trauma