Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest IO-first access likely inferior in OHCA

Cardiac arrest

IO-first access likely inferior in OHCA

Intraosseous versus intravenous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Bayesian secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC-3 randomised controlled trial
Resuscitation · 2026-11 · Added 26 September 2026

A pre-planned Bayesian secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC-3 RCT (6,082 adults with OHCA) found an intraosseous-first vascular access strategy was more likely harmful than beneficial, with an 81.6% posterior probability it was inferior to an intravenous-first strategy for 30-day survival.

Study type
RCT
Design
Bayesian secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
Participants
6,082 adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Main finding
Posterior probability the IO-first strategy improved 30-day survival was 18.4%; probability it was inferior was 81.6%
Caveat
Secondary analysis with non-informative priors; the treatment effect is likely modest and the primary trial was neutral
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Vascular access in cardiac arrest is core practice everywhere in Australia, so this speaks directly to how crews work, and the effect is most likely modest rather than dramatic.

Learning goal

Weigh the evidence for intravenous versus intraosseous first-line access when managing adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI)

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest