Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest Mainstream and sidestream capnography give different ETCO2

Cardiac arrest

Mainstream and sidestream capnography give different ETCO2

Differences between Mainstream and Sidestream Capnography during Resuscitation
Resuscitation Plus · 2026-11 · Added 8 November 2026

A Spanish retrospective analysis of 23 OHCA recordings with concurrent mainstream and sidestream capnography found mainstream systematically recorded higher ETCO2 (bias 3.94 mmHg, limits of agreement -3.21 to 11.09 mmHg), though trends and abrupt rises/drops were consistently co-detected.

Study type
Cohort
Design
Retrospective device-comparison analysis of synchronized capnography waveforms
Participants
23 OHCA recordings (3,460 paired ventilations)
Main finding
Mainstream ETCO2 bias +3.94 mmHg vs sidestream (limits of agreement -3.21 to 11.09 mmHg, proportional bias 0.0746); trends matched (-1.44 vs -1.41 mmHg/min, p=0.93); abrupt rises >=10 mmHg co-detected in 7/8 and drops in 10/15
Caveat
Small sample — 23 recordings from one region, so the wide limits of agreement are imprecisely estimated
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). ETCO2-guided CPR quality monitoring is standard practice on Australian ambulances, and the numbers crews chart or hand over at hospital depend on which technology the monitor uses.

Learning goal

Weigh how differences between mainstream and sidestream capnography affect my interpretation of EtCO2 trends during cardiac arrest.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI)

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest