Paramedic Papers

Home Operations & systems How US states organise EMS and trauma systems

Operations & systems

How US states organise EMS and trauma systems

From sirens to systems: Characterizing EMS and trauma care across America
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery · 2026-11-11 · Added 12 November 2026

A survey of EMS and trauma system leaders in all 50 US states plus DC found broad protocol and registry coverage — 84% statewide trauma triage protocols, 88% mandatory registry participation — but weak operational coordination, with only 6% a single point of contact for helicopter dispatch and 55% rating their system as needing at least moderate improvement.

Study type
Cross-sectional
Design
Cross-sectional survey of state EMS and trauma system leaders (56-item instrument)
Participants
51 US jurisdictions (all 50 states plus DC)
Main finding
84% had a state EMS medical director and statewide trauma triage protocols; 88% mandatory trauma registry participation; only 29% a centralised trauma communications centre and 6% a single HEMS dispatch contact; over half rated EMS funding in the two lowest adequacy categories and 55% wanted at least moderate system improvement
Caveat
Self-reported leader perceptions describing a US state-based structure that differs from Australian arrangements
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). A US state-patchwork survey — Australian state systems are more centralised, but the coordination, funding and rural-gap themes read familiar from this side of the Pacific.

Learning goal

Understand how system-level structures like trauma triage protocols and registry participation shape Australian prehospital trauma care.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Operations & systems