Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest Defining quality in bystander CPR

Cardiac arrest

Defining quality in bystander CPR

Development of a quality metric to measure bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out of hospital cardiac arrest: A modified Delphi study
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · 2026-10-17 · Added 2 November 2026

A UK-led modified Delphi study with an international panel of doctors, paramedics, nurses and laypersons reached consensus on 11 dichotomous indicators — compression rate, depth and recoil plus dispatcher instruction, time from recognition to emergency call and AED use — to measure bystander CPR quality in OHCA.

Study type
Guideline / statement
Design
Modified Delphi consensus study (two survey rounds plus a virtual consensus meeting)
Participants
104 panellists registered; 62, 48 and 18 completed rounds 1–3
Main finding
Consensus (≥75% agreement) on 11 indicators covering chest compression rate, depth and recoil and contextual factors including dispatcher instruction, time from recognition to emergency call and AED use; two composite indicators were created and all criteria scored dichotomously.
Caveat
The metric is provisional and unvalidated, and panel attrition left only 18 participants in the final consensus round.
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). Bystander CPR measurement matters to every Australian system, but this is a provisional consensus metric from one UK-led process that still needs validation before it informs anything on the ground.

Learning goal

Understand how bystander CPR quality indicators can inform community responder and dispatcher practice in cardiac arrest care.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest