Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac arrest AED coverage depends on how responders travel

Cardiac arrest

AED coverage depends on how responders travel

Locating automated external defibrillators in urban areas: considering different travel modes
Frontiers in Public Health · 2026-10-14 · Added 30 October 2026

A Chinese spatial optimisation study of 17,842 OHCA dispatch records in Wuhan modelled AED coverage under different responder travel modes and found demand-weighted coverage ranged from 85% (driving) to 32% (walking), with universal walking coverage needing 521 extra AEDs versus 68 by car.

Study type
Modelling
Design
Spatial optimisation modelling (multimodal location set covering and maximal covering problems)
Participants
17,842 ambulance dispatch records and 3,569 existing AEDs across 1,161 grid cells in Wuhan
Main finding
Baseline demand-weighted 4-minute coverage was 85.07% for driving, 68.27% for cycling and 31.55% for walking; universal coverage required 68 additional AEDs under a driving assumption versus 521 under walking
Caveat
Modelled demand in a single city with no link to actual survival outcomes
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). A Chinese megacity model rather than an Australian deployment, but the core insight — AED planning collapses if volunteer responders walk instead of drive — applies to any community responder program here.

Learning goal

Understand how responder travel modes shape AED coverage and placement in Australian urban communities.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac arrest