Home Cardiac (non-arrest) Prehospital ACS risk stratification: the evidence
Cardiac (non-arrest)
Prehospital ACS risk stratification: the evidence
Contemporary Approaches to Prehospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Stratification: A Narrative Review
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine · 2026-10-15 · Added 17 October 2026
A narrative review of prehospital ACS risk stratification found HEART-derived pathways combined with point-of-care troponin carry the strongest evidence for safe field risk assessment, while AI-assisted ECG interpretation remains promising but prospectively unvalidated.
- Study type
- Other
- Design
- Narrative review
- Participants
- Literature 2020–2025 plus grey literature and citation review
- Main finding
- Biomarker-integrated pathways (HEART-derived approaches with point-of-care troponin) showed the strongest evidence for safe prehospital risk assessment; ECG transmission remains foundational for STEMI activation and AI decision-support lacks prospective outcome-based validation.
- Caveat
- Narrative rather than systematic — no protocol, formal search strategy or quality appraisal.
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Prehospital ECG acquisition and chest-pain triage pathways are standard across Australian services, so the review's map of what works — and what's still unproven — reads directly onto local practice.
Learning goal
Weigh the role of biomarker-integrated pathways and point-of-care troponin against ECG-based assessment in prehospital ACS risk stratification.
More
- Topic: Cardiac (non-arrest)
- Daily scan: 17 October 2026
Related papers on Cardiac (non-arrest)
-
POC troponin on ambulances: fewer ED visits
A French economic model built on 737 patients found prehospital point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin reduced ED attendance (90.9% vs 96.7%) and ED length of stay (1.63 vs 2.76 hours) versus standard care for suspected acute coronary syndrome.
-
Self-presenting STEMI patients fare worse
Tehran cohort of STEMI patients found those who self-presented had 2.17 times the in-hospital mortality of EMS-transferred patients, alongside longer door-to-balloon times (60 vs 49 minutes).
-
Cardiogenic shock: prehospital recognition and routing
Best-practice review of cardiogenic shock systems of care covering prehospital and ED evaluation argues early identification and direct routing to shock centres prevents irreversible organ damage, while conceding prehospital identification remains difficult.
-
A third of MI patients delay over two hours
A cross-sectional study of 105 myocardial infarction patients in Ahmedabad found a median symptom-to-hospital time of 90 minutes, with 35.2% delayed beyond 2 hours and female sex predicting delay (OR 3.2).