Paramedic Papers

Home Cardiac (non-arrest) Prehospital ACS risk stratification: the evidence

Cardiac (non-arrest)

Prehospital ACS risk stratification: the evidence

Contemporary Approaches to Prehospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Stratification: A Narrative Review
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine · 2026-10-15 · Added 17 October 2026

A narrative review of prehospital ACS risk stratification found HEART-derived pathways combined with point-of-care troponin carry the strongest evidence for safe field risk assessment, while AI-assisted ECG interpretation remains promising but prospectively unvalidated.

Study type
Other
Design
Narrative review
Participants
Literature 2020–2025 plus grey literature and citation review
Main finding
Biomarker-integrated pathways (HEART-derived approaches with point-of-care troponin) showed the strongest evidence for safe prehospital risk assessment; ECG transmission remains foundational for STEMI activation and AI decision-support lacks prospective outcome-based validation.
Caveat
Narrative rather than systematic — no protocol, formal search strategy or quality appraisal.
Bottom line
Context only

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Prehospital ECG acquisition and chest-pain triage pathways are standard across Australian services, so the review's map of what works — and what's still unproven — reads directly onto local practice.

Learning goal

Weigh the role of biomarker-integrated pathways and point-of-care troponin against ECG-based assessment in prehospital ACS risk stratification.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Cardiac (non-arrest)