Paramedic Papers

Home Trauma Updated field triage rules catch nearly all major trauma

Trauma

Updated field triage rules catch nearly all major trauma

Performance of updated American College of Surgeons field triage guidelines in identifying need for trauma center care
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2026-10-08 · Added 9 October 2026

A Canadian health-records review of 1,427 patients transported to a level 1 trauma centre found the 2021 US field triage guidelines were highly sensitive (97.3%) but poorly specific (13.3%) for identifying need for trauma centre care.

Study type
Cohort
Design
Retrospective health records review
Participants
1,427 patients at a level 1 trauma centre
Main finding
Field Triage Guideline criteria had 97.3% sensitivity and 13.3% specificity for trauma centre need (AUROC 0.80), with mental status and vital signs most strongly associated
Caveat
Single-centre cohort of transported patients only, retrospective design, US-derived criteria applied in Canada
Bottom line
Hypothesis-generating

Why it matters in Australia (High relevance). Prehospital trauma triage tools and undertriage targets are shared problems across Australian services, and the finding that mental status and vital signs drive accuracy applies to any field triage scheme.

Learning goal

Weigh the trade-off between sensitivity and overtriage when applying updated field triage criteria to major trauma patients.

Open in dashboard Read the paper (DOI) PubMed

More

Related papers on Trauma