Home Trauma Prehospital vasopressors in trauma unproven
Trauma
Prehospital vasopressors in trauma unproven
Utility and outcomes of prehospital vasopressors infusion in trauma patients: a systematic review
European Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2026-09-24 · Added 3 October 2026
Systematic review of five retrospective studies (31,849 trauma patients) found prehospital vasopressor infusions before haemorrhage control showed inconsistent mortality associations — one military study found markedly lower adjusted survival and another linked vasopressors to more massive transfusion and coagulopathy — on very-low-certainty evidence.
- Study type
- Systematic review
- Design
- Systematic review of observational studies
- Participants
- 5 retrospective studies, 31,849 patients (1443 received vasopressors)
- Main finding
- Associations with mortality were mixed; one military study found significantly lower adjusted survival with vasopressors (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18–0.56), and one study linked them to massive transfusion (aOR 4.97) and trauma-induced coagulopathy (aOR 3.05)
- Caveat
- Very-low-certainty retrospective data with substantial variation in vasopressor exposure and inevitable confounding by indication
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). Continuous prehospital vasopressor infusions in trauma are not something most Australian ambulances run — a handful of critical-care-capable units excepted — so this informs the debate more than current practice.
Learning goal
Weigh the risks and benefits of prehospital vasopressor infusions in trauma patients before haemorrhage control.
More
- Topic: Trauma
- Daily scan: 3 October 2026
- Podcast: Paramedic Papers Daily, 3 October 2026
Related papers on Trauma
-
US racial gaps in trauma interventions
US trauma–EMS linked cohort of 18,280 injured adults found Black patients received fewer prehospital airway interventions and intubations than White patients, and patients from disadvantaged neighbourhoods received fewer prehospital interventions overall.
-
Violence-related EMS calls: who actually dies
A retrospective registry review of 29,335 violence-related EMS encounters in Istanbul found confirmed prehospital death in only 0.45%, most strongly associated with severe respiratory compromise (aOR 56), altered consciousness (aOR 10.7) and cyanosis (aOR 4.2).
-
Language barriers change trauma assessment
US retrospective analysis of 1,220,982 EMS-attended blunt trauma activations examining whether patient-provider language barriers change prehospital care — the 2% with documented language barriers were more often treated and transported (80.3% vs 75.1%) yet less likely to have pain scores documented (60.6% vs 63.6%), with slightly more GCS 3–8 presentations, showing assessment and documentation patterns shift when clinician and patient can't share a language.
-
Prehospital whole blood no mortality benefit
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prehospital whole blood transfusion in traumatic haemorrhagic shock; abstract not yet available (ahead-of-print), so no findings can be reported yet.