Home Trauma Prehospital blood for non-traumatic haemorrhage
Trauma
Prehospital blood for non-traumatic haemorrhage
Prehospital Blood Transfusion for Medical Causes of Hemorrhage: A Case Series
Prehospital Emergency Care · Added 1 September 2026
Retrospective observational study of prehospital whole blood for non-traumatic haemorrhagic shock across two US systems — GI bleeding (49%) and unspecified shock (43%) were the main indications, vitals improved (HR 102→96, SBP 83→106)
- Study type
- Case series
- Design
- Retrospective observational study across two fire-based EMS systems
- Participants
- 47 patients given prehospital blood for non-traumatic haemorrhagic shock
- Main finding
- Of 163 transfusions, 50 (30.7%) were non-traumatic; GI bleeding 49%, unspecified shock 43%; mean HR fell 102→96, SBP rose 83→106 mmHg, shock index 1.34→1.01
- Caveat
- Small case series without outcome or control data; US fire-based systems
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). transferability — Not in the ACTAS formulary — blood products are not carried, would require guideline change to adopt
Learning goal
Weigh the role of prehospital blood transfusion for non-traumatic haemorrhage against traditional fluid resuscitation.
More
- Topic: Trauma
- Daily scan: 1 September 2026
Related papers on Trauma
-
Junctional tourniquet harm after pelvic GSW
Case report of a patient with AAJT-S placed prehospital for pelvic gunshot wounds who suffered cardiac arrest upon device removal and developed metabolic acidosis, compartment syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, renal and liver infarcts, pulmonary emboli, and stroke
-
Safety warning: SPEAR chest decompression device
Safety warning about potential risks with the SPEAR® device marketed for out-of-hospital needle decompression of the chest. Abstract not yet available (ahead-of-print).
-
Blunt vs penetrating trauma physiology and outcomes
This Swedish registry of 2,193 trauma patients (353 penetrating) found penetrating trauma patients were younger (median 34 vs 49 years), more often male (78% vs 66%), more frequently in shock on arrival (5.9% vs 2.2%), and more likely to require emergency surgery (53% vs 30%) and early blood transfusion (20% vs 4.5%).
-
Predicting prehospital blood need after MVC trauma
Machine learning models using NEMSIS data achieved strong discrimination (AUC 0.906) for predicting prehospital blood transfusion after motor vehicle trauma, identifying physiologic measures and shock designation as key predictors.