Home Operations & systems Campus EMS naloxone and harm reduction survey
Operations & systems
Campus EMS naloxone and harm reduction survey
Harm Reduction on Campus: A National Survey of Collegiate-based EMS Agencies
Prehospital Emergency Care · Added 25 August 2026
National survey examined harm reduction programs in collegiate-based EMS agencies, assessing naloxone distribution, overdose response, and substance use support services.
- Study type
- Cross-sectional
- Design
- Cross-sectional online survey of collegiate EMS agency leaders
- Participants
- 41 collegiate-based EMS agencies (33% response rate)
- Main finding
- 93% stocked naloxone for overdose response, 46% offered public naloxone education, 7% distributed fentanyl test strips; barriers were institutional/policy issues, community engagement challenges, and resource constraints
- Caveat
- Low response rate and US collegiate EMS setting, limiting generalisability
- Bottom line
- Context only
Why it matters in Australia (Medium relevance). transferability — US campus-specific context but harm reduction principles applicable to community paramedicine models
Learning goal
Understand the system barriers that limit naloxone distribution and harm reduction in first response settings.
More
- Topic: Operations & systems
- Daily scan: 25 August 2026
Related papers on Operations & systems
-
What makes paramedic teleconsultation work
Qualitative study of 12 UK critical care and clinical advisory paramedics on teleconsultation — its effectiveness hinges on a 'teleconsultation competence gap' in training, organisational culture and whether governance feels punitive rather than supportive.
-
Indirect ICU admissions from Australian ED
Australian observational study found indirect ICU admissions (ED admission to non-critical care ward requiring ICU transfer within 24 hours) accounted for 11.3% of ED-to-ICU admissions, with circulatory insufficiency as the most common reason and hospital mortality of 12.8%.
-
Few quality indicators for prehospital post-ROSC care
Scoping review identified 16 potential quality indicators for prehospital post-ROSC care across five domains, highlighting a major evidence gap since only two existing studies listed formal indicators.
-
Defining diagnostic excellence in the ED
Consensus study using a modified RAND/UCLA panel method to define diagnostic excellence and missed diagnostic opportunity in emergency departments — diagnostic excellence is accurate, timely, evidence-based, and patient-centered communication of a diagnosis based on available information, while a missed diagnostic opportunity is a measurable divergence from optimal practice that may lead to inaccurate/delayed explanations or communication failures.