Home Cardiac arrest CPR on mattress vs floor: similar fatigue
Cardiac arrest
CPR on mattress vs floor: similar fatigue
Effect of Compression Surfaces on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality and Clinician Fatigue
Prehospital Emergency Care · Added 27 May 2026
They tested whether different compression surfaces affect CPR quality and clinician fatigue, and found surface characteristics significantly impact compression depth and rate consistency while also affecting provider fatigue.
- Study type
- Simulation
- Design
- Pilot randomised crossover manikin trial
- Participants
- 40 EMS clinicians
- Main finding
- Time to failure was 145 s (IQR 65–240) on floor vs 140 s (IQR 100–420) on mattress (p=0.64); compression rates 112/min vs 105/min (p=0.12); no difference in fatigue or compression quality between surfaces.
- Caveat
- Small pilot simulation study in young EMS clinicians; not powered for clinical outcomes
- Bottom line
- Hypothesis-generating
Learning goal
Weigh the trade-offs between moving a patient to the floor and continuing compressions on a firm mattress during resuscitation.
More
- Topic: Cardiac arrest
- Daily scan: 27 May 2026
Related papers on Cardiac arrest
-
Geolocation recruits responders to defibrillators
This study evaluated whether a geolocation system can recruit volunteer first responders to nearby defibrillators in real time, and found it successfully mobilised responders and shortened time to first shock compared with historical controls.
-
System failure drives poor OHCA outcomes in India
This commentary argues that poor resuscitation outcomes in India are driven by prehospital system failures rather than individual provider limitations, highlighting the need for structural reforms in emergency response infrastructure and training.
-
AED use varies by race and geography
Analysis of AED deployment patterns during EMS encounters revealing racial and geographic differences in defibrillator access and application.
-
EMS volume doesn't affect traumatic arrest outcomes
Retrospective cohort examining whether higher EMS encounter volume is associated with better management and outcomes in prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest.