Home Trauma Prehospital whole blood no better than components
Trauma
Prehospital whole blood no better than components
Prehospital Resuscitation with Type O Whole Blood for Trauma and Hemorrhage
New England Journal of Medicine · Added 18 May 2026
Multicenter randomized trial comparing prehospital type O whole blood resuscitation to standard care in trauma patients with hemorrhage.
- Study type
- RCT
- Design
- Pragmatic multicentre cluster-randomised phase 3 trial with 1-month blocks
- Participants
- 993 trauma patients with haemorrhagic shock transported by 44 air medical bases (695 whole blood, 298 components)
- Main finding
- 30-day mortality 25.9% with whole blood vs 20.5% with blood components (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.87–1.76; P=0.24). No difference by whole blood storage age (15–21 days vs 1–14 days: adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74–1.32).
- Caveat
- Cluster-randomised design with unbalanced group sizes (715 vs 305 patients) may have reduced power; air medical US setting.
- Bottom line
- Supports current practice
Learning goal
Weigh the benefits and limitations of prehospital whole blood compared with component therapy in traumatic haemorrhagic shock.
More
- Topic: Trauma
- Daily scan: 18 May 2026
Related papers on Trauma
-
Norwegian trauma criteria: high overtriage
They tested whether Norway's new national trauma criteria accurately predicted ISS>15 injuries and met triage goals, and found overtriage of 81.1% and undertriage of 11.5%, with mechanism of injury criteria showing very poor positive predictive value.
-
Freeze-dried plasma complements whole blood
This commentary argues freeze-dried plasma complements whole blood in prehospital resuscitation, offering a scalable, shelf-stable solution for rural and remote regions with long transport times.
-
Each advanced prehospital intervention adds scene time
Retrospective physician-led HEMS trauma study examining whether more advanced interventions are stretching scene times — each additional intervention increased scene time by 41%, although overall scene times stayed similar over two decades because of changing case mix.
-
Call to abandon routine spinal immobilisation
Commentary challenging continued routine spinal immobilisation in suspected spinal injury — the authors argue decades of evidence now consistently show harm without benefit, and that paramedic scope should evolve to reflect current evidence.